Link to Exchange home page
 
   
 
 

Network Evaluation Tool 3
Channels of Participation

 

See also

Introduction to network evaluation tools

Tool 1: Contributions Assessment

Tool 2: Weaver’s Triangle for Networks

 

HIV/AIDS communication

Social mobilisation

Learning evaluation

integrated communication

Capacity development

pdf file PDF of this tool

This is a simple way of defining how many "categories" of participation your network has and seeing how your members contribute.

The idea is not to categorise the members but to understand how people participate and at what levels. People may move between levels.

It may help to keep it simple. Three categories is probably enough for monitoring purposes.

The outer ring indicates a more remote relationship with the network, while the inner one indicates a more active and involved relationship.

Outer ring – this category of participation involves receipt of the newsletter, with an occasional contribution to the content of the newsletter

Middle ring – this category of participation involves receipt of the newsletter, with occasional contribution; and participation in the annual conference at some level.

Inner ring – this category of participation involves receipt of newsletter, participation in the annual conference, and participation in strategic activities, such as governance committee, policy work and/or lobbying.

In a second example, a lobbying network used the following numbered participation levels for its evaluation:

1. Inner-Circle, very regular shared communication and debate/discussion, input. Part of decision-making process. Trusted. Has regular dialogue with own government.

2. Regular communication/input, active with own government, trusted but not party to confidential information

3. Regular sharing of communication both ways. Active on appeals

4. Share information

5. Recipient of Information

They used a simple table to help them determine how much members participate, and what they contribute. They have also added in other factors, such as the level of access members have to key players. That way they can see where the gaps are in the network’s coverage or reach.

Name Country Participation Level Contribution Other Factors
eg Access
         
         

 

This is one of three tools developed by Madeline Church, University College London. See Introduction to network evaluation tools for further details.

top

ABOUT US | HEALTH COMMUNICATION | LEARNING | NETWORKING | RESOURCES & LINKS

www.healthcomms.org
© 2000-2005 Exchange, London, UK